• Governance
  • /
  • Corporate Governance
Coway is committed to increasing transparency and efficiency in corporate management.
Coway's BOD is entrusted with the supreme decision-making authority on corporate management by shareholders in accordance with laws and regulations, and establishes reasonable and sound corporate governance through checks and balances.
Responsible Management Centered on the BOD

The Coway Board of Directors (BOD) has a reasonably robust corporate governance structure featuring effective checks and balances and experts' decision-making power on corporate management allocated by shareholders in accordance with relevant laws and the articles of association. The BOD is responsible for coordinating the interests of stakeholders, monitoring investments and inside transactions, and deliberating and approving transparent compensation, while managing overall corporate risks. It also strives to improve transparency and efficiency of business management.

Current Status of the BOD

Name

Position

Gender

Professional experience

Appointed date

Jun-Hyuk Bang

Executive director (Chairman)

Male

  • 2020 ~ CurrentBOD Chairman, Coway
  • 2014 ~ CurrentBOD Chairman, Netmarble
  • 2011 ~ 2014Executive Advisor, Game Business Division, CJ E&M

2020.02.07

Jang-Won Seo

Executive director (CEO)

Male

  • 2021 ~ CurrentCEO, Coway
  • 2020 ~ 2021Head of Corporate Management Division, Coway, CFO
  • 2020 ~ 2020Head of Coway TF, Netmarble
  • 2019 ~ 2019Officer in Investment Strategy and Communication, Netmarble
  • 2015 ~ 2018Officer in Management Strategy, Netmarble
  • 2001 ~ 2015Senior U.S. Attorney, Sejong Law Firm

2020.02.07

Sun-Tae Kim

Executive director

Male

  • 2021 ~ CurrentHead of Corporate Management Division, Coway, CFO / Auditor, iOBED
  • 2019 ~ CurrentNon-executive director, Coway Entec
  • 2016 ~ 2021Director of Business Management, Coway
  • 2013 ~ 2015Head of Budget Management Team, Business Planning Team, Coway

2023.03.29

Jin-Bae Kim

Independent director

Male

  • 2001 ~ CurrentProfessor in Business Administration, Korea University
  • 1997 ~ 2001Assistant Professor, Boston University

2020.02.07

Kyu-Ho Kim

Independent director

Male

  • 2021 ~ CurrentProfessor (focused on academic-industrial cooperation), Ewha Womans University
  • 2015 ~ 2020Professor (focused on academic-industrial cooperation), Sogang University
  • 2013 ~ 2014Executive Director, Media Solution Center of Samsung Electronics

2020.02.07

Bu-Hyun Yoon

Independent director

Male

  • 2020 ~ CurrentAdvisor, LG Display
  • 2018 ~ 2020Advisor, LG Uplus
  • 2012 ~ 2018Executive Director, Management Planning of MC Business Group, LG Electronics
  • 2009 ~ 2011Managing Director in Charge of Finance, LG Electronics
  • 2007 ~ 2008Managing Director in Charge of Management Planning, LG Electronics

2020.02.07

Gil-Yeon Lee

Independent director

Female

  • 2009 ~ CurrentAttorney at Hokma, a law firm
  • 2019 ~ CurrentMember of Human Rights Management, the Korea Copyright Protection Agency
  • 2018 ~ 2020Member of the Administrative Appeals Committee, the Board of Audit and Inspection
  • 2013 ~ 2017Member of the Law Interpretation and Deliberation Committee, Ministry of Government Legislation
  • 2011 ~ 2013Special member of the Special Committee of the Legal Ethics Council, Korean Bar Association
  • 2010 ~ 2016Arbitrator of the Seoul City Environmental Dispute Mediation Committee
  • 2008 ~ 2014Adjunct professor at Inha University School of Law

2022.03.31

BOD Activities in 2022

In 2022, total 6 board meetings were held, with an average attendance rate of 100%.

Round

Date

Agenda

Result

Attendance rate

1

2022.02.15

  1. Approval of the 33rd financial statements and business reports

Approved

100%

  1. Convocation of the 33rd regular general shareholders meeting

Approved

  1. Decision on dividends for the 33rd period

Approved

  1. Approval of transactions with stakeholders (sales and purchases)

Approved

  1. Approval of transactions with stakeholders (debt guarantees)

Approved

  1. Approval of transactions between directors and the company

Approved

  1. Report and approval of the 2022 Safety and Health Plan

Approved

  1. Report on the status of internal accounting management operation by the CEO and internal accounting manager

Approved

  1. Reporting of the Audit Committee's inside accounting management system evaluation report

Reported

  1. The 4th quarter 2021 performance report

Reported

2

2022.03.08

  1. Decision to determine the method of granting stock options

Approved

100%

  1. Approval of transactions between directors and the company

Approved

3

2022.05.12

  1. Amendment to the Executive Compensation Policy

Approved

100%

  1. Approval of transactions between directors and the company (Netmarble N2)

Approved

  1. The 1st quarter 2022 performance report

Reported

4

2022.08.09

  1. Approval of transactions with stakeholders (debt guarantees)

Approved

100%

  1. The 2nd quarter 2022 performance report

Reported

5

2022.11.09

  1. Appointment of additional members to the ESG Committee

Approved

100%

  1. The 3rd quarter 2022 performance report

Reported

6

2022.12.13

  1. Approval of transactions with stakeholders

Approved

100%

  1. Approval of the business plans for 2023

Approved

  1. Report on the approval of the Management Committee

Reported

  1. Reporting of the agendas approved by the ESG Committee

Reported

Expertise and Independence of the Board
Election of directors with expertise and diversity

In accordance with Article 382 of the Commercial Act, the BOD consists of three executive and four independent directors as of the end of March, 2023. The number of independent directors (57.1 percent) outnumbers executive directors, which ensures the BOD’s fairness and independence. The BOD members, who are experts in diverse areas, including business management, accounting, and law, make decisions efficiently and carefully.

Coway has an Independent Director Candidate Recommendation Committee to ensure fairness and independence in the selection process. The selection of independent directors is finalized at the general meeting. For the selection of directors at the general meeting, detailed information on the candidates including personal history, fields of expertise, recommenders, and transactions with Coway should be provided 14 days prior to the general meeting, to prove their independence of the company. For the transparency and independence of the BOD, we carefully review any conflict of interest, including possession of shares in Coway, and transparently disclose their legal qualifications to stakeholders and shareholders. To verify the independence of outside directors, we have established guidelines that comply with relevant laws and regulations and global standards. We aim to improve the level of independence of outside directors by screening candidates more rigorously, and we verify the independence of candidates and existing outside directors in accordance with these guidelines.

The BOD at Coway consists of experts in diverse areas regardless of gender and age, to ensure that it does not represent specific interests or vocational groups. In particular, we seek to sharpen our BOD’s competitiveness by stressing the candidates’ expertise in the process of selecting independent directors. We recruit experts in a wide range of areas, including business administration, industry, finance/accounting, and law for the BOD’s diversity and expertise.

Independence of the BOD

Coway makes sure that appointed Board of Directors (BODs) members meet the qualifications required by the relevant laws and articles of association. Also, we impose restrictions on appointing those who are responsible for damaging corporate value or infringing shareholders’ rights and interests as executives by revising the “Personnel Management Regulations for Executives.”

Coway selects outside director candidates transparently and fairly through Independent Director Candidate Recommendation Committee, which is composed of only outside directors. The Independent Director Candidate Recommendation Committee selects candidates for independent directors among those who have no conflicts of interest with the company and its largest shareholder and, consequently, can supervise the company’s business management independently from the management.

In addition, our BOD is organized in such a way that it does not represent specific interests or specific occupational groups in order for it to effectively exercise checks and balances. For transparent governance, we disclose relevant business processes, procedures, and outcomes. We also have internal regulations, such as the articles of association and BOD regulations, to establish a system of checks and balances among the BOD, management, and independent directors.

Outside Director Independence Guidelines

Coway secures the independent decision-making authority of the Board of Directors and establishes a reasonable and sound governance structure centered on independent directors through checks and balances.

In order to verify the independence of outside directors, Coway has established guidelines that comply with relevant laws and regulations and global standards. Based on these requirements, the BOD and the Independent Director Candidate Recommendation Committee verify the independence of outside director candidates and existing outside directors. We will determine that an outside director is independent if he/she meets the following points, and will comprehensively consider any other material relationship with the company.

Conditions for Outside Directors
  1. A person who is not disqualified as a director under the law
  2. A person who does not have a history of damaging corporate value or infringing on shareholder rights and interests
  3. A person whose attendance rate at board meetings was 75% or more during the previous term of office
  4. A person who is not a full-time employee of the Company or its affiliated companies (including non-profit corporations) within the last five years
  5. A person who is not a director/executive officer/auditor or employee within the last two years of an entity that has a technology partnership agreement with the Company
  6. A person who is not a director/executive officer/auditor and an employee within the last two years of the accounting firm appointed as the Company's auditor
  7. A person who is not a director/executive officer/auditor and an employee within the last two years of an entity that has entered into a single transaction with the Company during the last fiscal year with an aggregate value of 10% or more of the Company's total revenue
  8. A person who is not a director/executive officer/auditor and employee within the last two years of an entity whose aggregate transaction results with the Company during the last three business years amounted to 10% or more of the Company's total assets or total sales
  9. A person who is not a director/executive officer/auditor or employee within the last three years of an entity that has a major legal or management consulting contract with the Company
  10. A person who is not an advisor or consultant to the Company or the Company's management
  11. Any other person who does not have a material interest in matters to be decided by the BOD
Evaluation Standard for Independence and Conflicts of Interest
Disqualification Criteria
  1. Directors, executive officers, and employees engaged in the company's business affairs, or directors, auditors, executive officers and employees engaged in the company's business affairs within the past two years
  2. The largest shareholder himself, spouse, and direct ancestor or descendant
  3. In case the largest shareholder is a corporate body, its directors, auditors, executive officers, and employees
  4. The spouse and the direct ancestor or descendant of directors, auditors, and executive officers
  5. Directors, auditors, executive officers and employees of the company's parent company or subsidiaries
  6. Directors, auditors, executive officers and employees of corporations with important interests, such as the company's business relationships
  7. Directors, auditors, executive officers and employees of other companies whose directors, executive officers are directors, executive officers and employees of the company
Conflicts of Interest
  1. The same person and people related to the Fair-Trade Act that governs a company in competition with the company
  2. Employees of a company that compete with the company and those belonging to the same corporate group under the Fair-Trade Act or a person who has been an employee within the past two years
  3. The company's largest shareholder or the second-largest shareholder of a company in a competitive relationship with the company, and an employee of a company belonging to the same corporate group under the Fair-Trade Act, or a person who has been an employee within the past two years
Committees under the BOD

For efficient and professional operation of the BOD, we have set up various BOD Committees, including the Management Committee, Independent Director Candidate Recommendation Committee, Audit Committee, and ESG Committee. As of April 2023, the Management Committee consisted of three executive directors, the Audit Committee, three independent directors, and the Independent Director Candidate Recommendation Committee, three independent directors, and the ESG Committee, one executive director and two independent directors. As members of the BOD, independent directors hold a majority, which allows the BOD to fulfill its responsibility to check the management in accordance with the principle of checks and balances. The Management Committee consists of executive directors only as it deliberates and decides on diverse matters on business activities. Other committees include independent directors with expertise in their fields.

BOD Committee Members and Activities
Performance Evaluation and Remuneration
Performance Evaluation and Remuneration for Independent Directors

In order to recruit outstanding experts as independent directors and support them in actively fulfilling their duties, we provide reasonable remuneration in consideration of the level of legal responsibility and renumeration level in the same industry. We evaluate independent directors qualitatively in terms of attendance and practicality of their suggestions, but we do not reflect it in remuneration and reappointment of independent directors. We have a principle of not remunerating independent directors based on the evaluation results as it may impair the independence of independent directors.

Performance Evaluation System for CEO and Executives

Coway aims to promote the sustainable development of Coway by inducing and rewarding CEOs and executives for their responsible participation in the mid- and long-term growth of the company, preventing decisions based on short-term performance.

Short-term Performance Evaluation

The basic remuneration for executive directors is determined in consideration of their duties and positions, tenure, leadership, expertise, and contribution to the company. Also, we provide incentives (bonuses) based on overall scores and goal fulfillment by taking growth potential, profitability, and stability into consideration in accordance with the key performance indicators(KPI) consisting of qualitative and quantitative indicators. In addition, we adjust bonuses by evaluating project outcomes, performance, and capacity.

Long-term Performance Evaluation

Coway established the Long-Term Incentive (LTI) in 2022 to manage balanced short- and long-term performance. We evaluate the CEO's long-term management performance by considering three years of performance based on the degree of contribution and competence in long-term perspective management.

For non-CEO executives

Coway evaluates not only the CEO but also other executives on their long-term competency performance. The main management competencies are strategic decision-making, positive influence, talent development, fairness, communication, and cooperation, and the evaluation is based on the cumulative performance of three years.

Directors Remuneration

Name

Category

Total (Unit: KRW 1000)

Standards and Methods

Jun-Hyuk Bang

Salary

746,530

The total annual salary is set and paid at KRW 746,235,000 by comprehensively reflecting the duty (chairman of the BODs), leadership, expertise, and contribution to the company. In addition, KRW 295,000 was paid with taxes reflected

Bonus

490,280

Bonuses were paid based on the key performance indicators (KPIs) consisting of quantitative and qualitative indicators. The KPIs evaluate quantitative indicators which consist of growth potential, profitability, and stability, and qualitative indicators which include strategic tasks for the year, based on the comprehensive evaluation table to calculate the overall scores.

Note

Profits from the exercise of stock options, other earned income, retirement income, and other income are not applicable.

Hae-Sun Lee

Salary

604,300

The total annual salary is set at KRW 600,000,000 by comprehensively reflecting the duty (CEO), tenure, leadership, expertise, and company contribution, among others, all of which are comprehensively reviewed and paid. In addition, KRW 4,300,000 including benefit points, was paid.

Bonus

255,000

Bonuses were paid based on the key performance indicators (KPIs) consisting of quantitative and qualitative indicators. The KPIs evaluate quantitative indicators (sales, customer accounts, etc.), which consist of growth potential, profitability, and stability, and qualitative indicators (leadership, growth engines, etc.), which include strategic tasks for the year, based on the comprehensive evaluation table to calculate the overall scores.

Other earned income

1,780

Business vehicle income disposition amount (recognized bonus)

Jang-Won Seo

Salary

505,110

The total annual salary is set at KRW 500,000,000 by comprehensively reflecting the duty (CEO), leadership, expertise, and company contribution, among others, all of which are comprehensively reviewed and paid. In addition, KRW 5,110,000 was paid with other welfare points and taxes reflected.

Bonus

250,000

Bonuses were paid based on the key performance indicators (KPIs) consisting of quantitative and qualitative indicators. The KPIs evaluate quantitative indicators (sales, customer accounts, etc.), which consist of growth potential, profitability, and stability, and qualitative indicators (leadership, growth engines, etc.), which include strategic tasks for the year, based on the comprehensive evaluation table to calculate the overall scores.

Note

Profits from the exercise of stock options, other earned income, retirement income, and other income are not applicable.

Mid- to Long-Term Dividend Policy

Coway has established and disclosed a medium-term dividend policy to enhance the predictability of dividends for shareholders. In accordance with the principle of enhancing shareholder value, Coway plans to allocate financial resources generated within the range of distributable profits to strategic investments for sustainable growth, maintaining a sound financial structure (including cash flow), and returning to shareholders, taking the internal and external business environment into account. Coway plans to pay cash dividends once a year within the range of 40% of annual separate FCF and 20% of dividend payout ratio based on consolidated net income, taking business conditions into account.

Ownership Structure and Voting Rights
Stocks Owned by Stockholders and Management

As of the end of 2022, Coway’s shareholders consisted of Netmarble (25.08 percent), foreign investors (61.31 percent), local institutions and others (11.94 percent), and treasury stock (1.67 percent). The total number of shares issued by Coway is 73,799,619 shares, which consist of 100% common shares without preferred shares.

Coway follows the principle of 1 voting per share and does not have a differential voting system that grants multiple voting rights to specific stocks. However, voting rights of treasury stocks held as treasury stocks are limited by commercial law. As of the end of December 2022, 72,563,745 shares (98.32% of the total issued shares) had voting rights. Coway does not utilize the written or electronic voting system. Instead, we encourage shareholders who have difficulty in exercising their voting rights to exercise such rights by proxy. Also, we do not use cumulative voting in accordance with the articles of association, but we plan to consider implementing it if it is necessary in the future.